Pindula
Register Login

Judicial Service Commission Says Its Official Website Was Hacked

Judicial Service Commission Says Its Official Website Was Hacked

The Judicial Service Commission (JSC) says its official website was hacked recently and the hackers posted information that is “patently false and meant to mislead members of the public.”

In a statement issued on Monday, 21 November, JSC said information that has been shared by “Team Pachedu” purportedly taken from its website was posted by “intruders” and therefore false. Part of the statement reads:

It has come to our attention that there is a Twitter handle, @PacheduZW, operated by what is referred to as ‘Team Pachedu’ which has been sharing some information that they purport to have uplifted from the JSC website.

We wish to inform the public that the information they are sharing which they purport to have accessed through the JSC website is false. We state hereunder some of the false narratives;

Kudzanai Machemedze is not and has never been employed by the Judicial Service Commission.

He was studying towards a BSc Information Systems Honours Degree with the Midlands State University and he applied for Industrial attachment with the JSC on 5 May 2021.

He was on attachment as a student with the JSC from May 2021 to November 2021. He was a student on training, he, therefore, did not have the capacity at all to design or build websites, let alone be involved in JSC procurement processes.

During the COVID-19 era, there were travel restrictions imposed by the Government to contain, combat and prevent the spread of the COVID-19 pandemic.

Courts were declared essential services and members of staff were therefore required to go to work.

For ease of travel, members of the Judicial Service were issued with letters which they would produce to the authorities.

These letters were given in hard copy form and were never posted on the JSC website because they are not part of the regular information shared on the public domain by the JSC.

Whilst we are unable to confirm whether or not one such letter was issued to Mr Machemedze during his time of attachment, we are certain that no such letters were ever posted on our website as alleged.

The quotations and billing invoices which are being attributed to the JSC by Team Pachedu were allegedly issued in 2020.

Without admitting that they are genuine, these documents were issued well before Kudzanai Machemedze started his industrial attachment with the JSC in May 2021.

In any case, Kudzanai Machemedze was never engaged by the JSC as a software developer, neither did he participate in building the JSC website.

He was a student on training, he therefore did not have the capacity to execute such a task as alleged.

The Judicial Service Commission never procured any services for cyber security as alleged. Even if it did, the Judicial Service Commission follows laid down procurement processes which do not involve assigning students on attachment to do procurement on its behalf.

Procurement documents are delivered in hard copy form and subjected to rigorous procurement processes before they are submitted for payment through a Government payment system known as Paynet. This process and the documents thereto are not posted on the JSC website.

The allegations that we received and posted on our website an invoice of USD $119 450 for cyber security are therefore false.

Government through treasury never paid for the alleged USD$119 450.

The information purported to have been accessed on the JSC website by ‘Team Pachedu’ has not been accessed from official information on the JSC website but has been posted by ill-meaning intruders to spin their malicious narrative.

The contents of that information are patently false and meant to mislead members of the public.

The JSC has since launched full scale investigations into the unauthorized intrusion into its website.

Finally, we wish to assure members of the public that the Judicial Service Commission servers are secure.

Share Article

Sponsored

5 Comments

Doug 2 months ago

Is this the same team that is alleged by ZEC to have hacked its site? So the KSC system also had loopholes to be taken advantage of? Since we have only been reading that the team has done a hack and nowhere else are we reading that they have been sanctioned or been arrested, would it be correct to say that it is a team of Ethical Hackers who help others by showing the weaknesses in their ICT systems so that they make them more secure?


Registered Voter 2 months ago

@Doug yhey may be ethical hackers but however the citizenry is misled by CCC sympathisers. Team Paxhedu should now be fact checked. Some stories dzavo pa Twitter ini hangu dzimwe dzacho i am able yo tell when they are falsifying facts with fiction. Zimbabweans should know real facts like what US is now doing.


Vesto 2 months ago

There's a Third Force here at play. Team Pachedu is already under fire from ZEC. Why would a techno-savy group like Team Pachedu leave trails of their entry into the JSC website? Someone out there is trying to poison Team Pachedu's image for their own nefarious ends.

When Team Pachedu saw loopholes in the ZEC server and voters roll, they went public and engaged ZEC. Unfortunately ZEC failed to take advantage of the team's skills and resources. With ZEC taking Team Pachedu to Court and Team Pachedu being seen as busy bodies, the judiciary is unlikely to be generous with Pachedu. Who is the likely beneficiary of Team Pachedu's fall from grace?

I have three candidates:-
1. ZANU
2. ZEC
3. The military/intelligence combination especially through the AFRICOM Links


VYBZ KARTEL 2 months ago

Owe fokoro mhani you know very well kuti team pachedu are agents of war brought about by Western imperials of which your puppy of a leader is part and parcel so do not come with your imperial apologistic 💩

Vesto 2 months ago

@VYBZ, instead of just going ballistic, provide evidence that Team Pachedu are agents, that Western imperialists are interested in thi Banana Republic.

language my dear boy. debate, don't argue. Calling me and Chamisa names doesn't win the debate


Leave a comment


Recent News


News Categories



Feedback